« Homnick: Hillary's running in '08! | Main | Liberal Dinosaurs »

Not Everyone Has Buried the GOP

I was optimistic about Republicans' chances a year ago when most everyone else was saying how great 2006 would be for the Democrats. I had remained pretty optimistic until the Foley scandal broke. Even then, I was not convinced the GOP would lose control of Congress, but I began to worry a bit when I saw how the positive momentum Republicans had been experiencing turned and so many polls reflected it. Now my optimism is returning, in spite of some pretty scary polls in some key races. There is still over two weeks to go, and that is enough time for things to swing one way or another. I don't think anyone should be celebrating yet, and certainly no one should be throwing in the towel. Helping feed my optimism are predictions like this one in Barron's.

JUBILANT DEMOCRATS SHOULD RECONSIDER their order for confetti and noisemakers. The Democrats, as widely reported, are expecting GOP-weary voters to flock to the polls in two weeks and hand them control of the House for the first time in 12 years -- and perhaps the Senate, as well. Even some Republicans privately confess that they are anticipating the election-day equivalent of Little Big Horn. Pardon our hubris, but we just don't see it.

Our analysis -- based on a race-by-race examination of campaign-finance data -- suggests that the GOP will hang on to both chambers, at least nominally. We expect the Republican majority in the House to fall by eight seats, to 224 of the chamber's 435. At the very worst, our analysis suggests, the party's loss could be as large as 14 seats, leaving a one-seat majority. But that is still a far cry from the 20-seat loss some are predicting. In the Senate, with 100 seats, we see the GOP winding up with 52, down three

We studied every single race -- all 435 House seats and 33 in the Senate -- and based our predictions about the outcome in almost every race on which candidate had the largest campaign war chest, a sign of superior grass-roots support. We ignore the polls. Thus, our conclusions about individual races often differ from the conventional wisdom. Pollsters, for instance, have upstate New York Republican Rep. Tom Reynolds trailing Democratic challenger Jack Davis, who owns a manufacturing plant. But Reynolds raised $3.3 million in campaign contributions versus $1.6 million for Davis, so we score him the winner.
...
Is our method reliable? It certainly has been in the past. Using it in the 2002 and 2004 congressional races, we bucked conventional wisdom and correctly predicted GOP gains both years. Look at House races back to 1972 and you'll find the candidate with the most money has won about 93% of the time. And that's closer to 98% in more recent years, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Polls can be far less reliable. Remember, they all but declared John Kerry president on Election Day 2004.

One reason I remain optimistic is that there is still so much work that can be done that can still make a difference. Please read my post from last week, They Only Win If We Let Them, to find out ways you can have an effect on the election.

  • Currently 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not Everyone Has Buried the GOP:

» The Right Nation linked with Money Matters (Sometimes)

Comments (8)

Lorie...Oh, I'm so with you... (Below threshold)
Dallas:

Lorie...Oh, I'm so with you. You, DJ Drummond and Alexander McClure have kept me away from the shrink's couch. All of you are so sane.

I gave up on Michale Maillcan after she knee jerked and said she wouldn't vote in this election because Bush was pocket vetoing an immigration bill. I knew she didn't deserve my time when she reacted before she had the facts. The President hadn't even been presented the bill. She lost my respect.

Hey...respect is all that you can want for in the blog world.

You, on the other hand, have so much good, grounded common sense. Could it be the tar on your heels? Whatever.

I do respect you, DJ, Alexander and a very few others who think and then speak. You are the best.

Dallas

Thanks Dallas,Alexan... (Below threshold)
Lorie Byrd:

Thanks Dallas,
Alexander and DJ help keep me sane, too, along with Hugh Hewitt and a handful of others. I think that what happens is that after a while of hearing doom and gloom, over and over again, that even some of those who believed with their heads otherwise, gave in to the conventional wisdom because it was all they were hearing. Until Foley broke it looked like the GOP was on its way to proving everyone of them wrong. I still think they could surprise some people, and do better than expected, but we really won't know until that day. Ain't politics fun?

how about a little love for... (Below threshold)
moflicky:

how about a little love for Eric Dickerson against Julia Carson in Indy?

Considered a safe seat, Dickerson, with no national help and a 10-1 funding disadvantage is up this week in a poll, and we just passed a voter ID law, which is likely to suppress the 'early and often' vote, long suspected as helping only 2 reps hold that seat for the last 40 years.

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061020/LOCAL19/610200504

every seat counts!

The reason to remain optimi... (Below threshold)
kirktoe:

The reason to remain optimistic is beacuse the media's track record the last 2 years has been miserable. Remember they tried this in the 2004 Presidential elections, even going so far as to push the exit polls as the gospel truth.

I am totally confident that we will hold both the Senate and the House. And if I needed any affirmation of it, I got it from Dick Morris this week. He said the GOP was doomed and that all the evangelical Christians were going to sit it out. My friends, Dick Morris is NEVER right. In fact, when he says something, the exact opposite happens.

Besides, I'm a Christian and I plan to vote.

I'll admit the media has been VERy aggresive pushing this "tidal wave" for the Democrats but you watch as we get closer the next 2 weeks. The polls will tighten as they always do, mainly because the pollsters, while mostly lieral, do have a reputation and credibility to worry about and they aren't going to continue to do these bogus push polls and then have election day roll around and see it their reputation go down the drain.

You already see isolated articles preparing the excuses if Dem's lose. They will become more common by November 1.

The expectations game alway... (Below threshold)

The expectations game always ends up being the toughest opponent in politics. Right now, we have 'em right where we want 'em: predicting a "blue wave" taking back the House and probably the Senate.

As this proposed outcome becomes clearly fixed in the public mind, voters will tend to look a little closer at the probable winners, and will see, like the befuddled Emperor, that they have nothing on! No plans, no proposals, no vision. The Democrats want to raise taxes and the minimum wage, and cut and run from Iraq; everything else is a great big secret.

It's hard to beat something, even a weak something, with nothing.

Another benefit of the expectations game and the atmosphere it creates is the effect on the "swing" voters. These are people without strong convictions who don't pay close attention to politics. The danger of a negative expectation is that many of these people want to be voting for the winners.

BUT there is another aspect as well: as the polls close up, as kirktoe correctly observes they will, the GOP will take on the image of the fighting underdog. People also love to root for the underdog, and they hate when elites presume to know what they will do in the voting booth. This gives us an even or better chance at the late-deciders who could determine the outcome.

Our GOTV effort is the Ace in the hole. Democrats will be spending plenty on GOTV too, but they use primarily paid operatives. It's not just an adventure, it's a job, and the type of people available for such temp employment don't generally come from the pool of highly-motivated and qualified employees. The GOP relies upon entirely upon volunteers at the grassroots level, people who feel a part of the effort and who have a stake in the outcome. Not only do they perform better, but they leave more resources for other needs.

It's a tough election, and we will probably lose some seats. But it's not as bad as it is being portrayed, IMO. We have a tough but doable task ahead. Ignore the naysayers and Gloomy Guses and git 'er done.

I just keep thinking about ... (Below threshold)
yetanotherjohn:

I just keep thinking about the 5 to 7 democratic senate seats that would have been in play with the right candidate recruitment. If we had that, we would be seriously discussing a range from no losses to a filibuster proof majority.

I'm not sure I buy all of Barron's ideas (e.g. Kennedy in Minn.), but I also don't think we are going to lose the senate.

I agree that there's a lot ... (Below threshold)
archtop:

I agree that there's a lot to be optimistic about. In fact, I'll make a few more predictions about the upcoming election:

* Turnout will be low on the ** democrat ** side. The media have so widely disseminated the myth that the democrats have it "in the bag" that many democrats won't bother to vote. After all, they've got it won - right? Why fight the crowds, the inconvenient locations, etc.?

* If the democrats do poorly (and there is a fair chance they will do poorly), this will all but destroy the credibility of main stream media in this country (whatever shred of credibility they have left). I stopped listening to CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc., along with the newspaper clowns, a long time ago. I downsized my cable TV and I refuse newspapers - especially USA Today. This election cycle will prove them to be the worthless windbags that they are.

We should also add to the big loser pile certain polling companies whose product will have been found to be so tainted and unscientific as to be useless. I wonder if they understand what caller ID is all about?


The media circus has two po... (Below threshold)
Richard:

The media circus has two points. Either works for them. 1 - suppress replican votes.2 - laying the groundwork for "we wuz robbed."




Advertisements






rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

politicstips@wizbangblog.com

Categories

Monthly Archives

Wizbang Politics Blogroll

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

DCMA Compliance Notice

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Site Meter