My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM | 
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM | 16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM | 5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM | 41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM | 44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM | 7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM | 10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM | 35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM | 10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM | 39 comments
Comments (5)
It is a strong ad, and I co... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Jim Addison | October 20, 2006 12:21 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It is a strong ad, and I completely agree it could be made stronger as you suggest.
We could even run different versions: as it is, a version splicing in Democratic speech quotes, and a version splicing in Democratic vote totals on key anti-terror initiatives.
It could only be the "Daisy ad" of 2006 with Democratic cooperation, however. They would have to scream bloody murder and make it a huge controversy. It is quite likely they would rise to the bait, though.
The actual "Daisy ad" ran only once, but generated such controversy that it was played over and over again on news programs for several days, essentially giving it free exposure nationally and painting the "nuclear cowboy" label on Goldwater indelibly in the public mind.
1. Posted by Jim Addison | October 20, 2006 12:21 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2006 00:21
2. Posted by Mark | October 20, 2006 7:38 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The purpose of this ad is to change the subject.
It brings back the Terrorism theme.
It serves its purpose, voters hate when you explicitly LINK to the Dems, let the local candidates do the dirty work.
This is fine. Nancy Johnson terror add is excellent.
2. Posted by Mark | October 20, 2006 7:38 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 20, 2006 07:38
3. Posted by WiseGuy | October 21, 2006 3:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Italics off
3. Posted by WiseGuy | October 21, 2006 3:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2006 15:19
4. Posted by WiseGuy | October 21, 2006 3:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Italics off one more time
4. Posted by WiseGuy | October 21, 2006 3:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2006 15:21
5. Posted by WiseGuy | October 21, 2006 3:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Trying for the last time.
5. Posted by WiseGuy | October 21, 2006 3:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2006 15:28