My oldest brings us two plus minutes of... well... just watch:...
4:56 PM |
1 comments
The House ethics committee found Rangel guilty of multiple house rules. CNN has a breaking news article on the topic but so far it doesn't contain any more information than...
12:19 PM |
16 comments
A picture is often indeed worth a thousand words, so no need to say much else. Hat tip: Hot Air....
12:10 PM |
5 comments
If you're Newsweek, you claim the job's too big... for any man:Can any single person fully meet the demands of the 21st-century presidency? Obama has looked to many models of...
6:31 AM |
41 comments
Unbelievable. Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), accused of a stunning array of corruption charges, involving lots and lots of money gained through illicit means (tax evasion, unreported income, unjustified benefits, and...
6:00 AM |
44 comments
They had me at... How can Americans create private sector jobs? The solution to America's jobs problem lies not with budget-busting federally mandated "stimulus" programs. Ah, your smal-government lower-regulation...
8:27 PM |
7 comments
That's Obama's description of Tȟatȟáŋka Íyotake aka Chief Sitting Bull in a new book he's written for children called Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters: President Obama's picture...
8:26 PM |
10 comments
Before the Sarah Palin fans out there get up in arms, hear me out. My main point is this. Sarah Palin would be much more effective supporting causes like fiscal...
5:00 PM |
35 comments
Over the weekend, my colleague Rick posted a piece about the latest strain of violence in Iraq -- the deliberate targeting of that nation's relatively few Christians. And that got...
4:00 PM |
10 comments
Well, it seems that everyone's upset about the new airport security measures -- either the body scanners that essentially strip you naked, or the "patdowns" that pretty much equates to...
2:00 PM |
39 comments
Comments (3)
I wouldn't be so sure, the ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by azgregory | August 9, 2006 9:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I wouldn't be so sure, the democrats will likely make a legal challenge to keep DeLay on the ballot and if that doesn't pan out they will probably challenge every write-in ballot. Anyway you slice it a long legal challenge awaits
1. Posted by azgregory | August 9, 2006 9:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 9, 2006 21:32
2. Posted by Jim Addison | August 9, 2006 10:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think DeLay can get his name OFF the ballot; that wasn't the problem. He wanted to get off and allow the Republicans to name a replacement candidate. That's what the court refused to do. The ruling was against the party, as I understand it, and doesn't force DeLay's name to stay ON - it only prevents him from being REPLACED. {Disclaimer: I did not personally read the decision, and am relying on characterizations in reports and commentaries around the time it was announced}.
This explains why the sudden push for a write-in campaign. The Democrat is a proven loser and the district is strongly Republican. The only Democratic hope was to keep DeLay and his legal problems on the ballot, or to keep all Republicans off of it.
I agree the Democrats will undoubtably attempt to challenge every write-in ballot if it appears the race might be close.
2. Posted by Jim Addison | August 9, 2006 10:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 9, 2006 22:10
3. Posted by BillyW | August 10, 2006 3:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
undoubtedly, the donks will try to challenge every write in vote. Good luck with that. This aint Flori-duh with a state supreme court that just kind of makes it up as they go along. Our Texas SC is elected and very conservative.
3. Posted by BillyW | August 10, 2006 3:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2006 15:07