Jim Geraghty discusses the game of poltiical prognostication and the track record of Congressional Quarterly.
All of that digging results in a pre-Election Day assessment that is much more accurate (and sometimes much more boring) than your usual Washington cocktail chatter. The most spectacular example of this occurred in 1998, when the Monica Lewinsky scandal had most pundits convinced that the GOP was set for big gains for much of the fall. (Newsweek predicted Republicans would pick up 30 seats.) CQ's seat-by-seat analysis suggested that the Democrats actually were in position to gain two seats -- and on Election Day, the Democrats picked up five.Regular readers know that I have never bought the conventional wisdom that Democrats would make gains in 2006 in the House or Senate. As I wrote here recently, and took some ribbing for it, I am with CQ in predicting that Republicans will hold their majorities. I feel completely comfortable in doing so. As Geraghty points out, when political predictions come true, you look really good and when they don't, most of the time nobody remembers what you predicted anyway.CQ was also the first news organization in 1994 to predict that the Republicans had a good chance to take over the House -- almost unthinkable at the time. And in 2004, CQ accurately forecasted the continued GOP control of both the House and the Senate.
This year, CQ is -- so far -- again going against the grain, projecting a continued GOP House majority, with 224 seats labeled safe, favorable, or leaning Republican. The Senate currently looks set for a minor shift with 54 GOP seats looking safe, favorable and leaning. Democrats appear to have some great pickup opportunities in the gubernatorial races, with only 17 GOP seats safe, favorable and leaning. A clean sweep would mean Democratic governors going from 22 to 34.



Comments (7)
It's not going against the ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Jeremy Wien | July 11, 2006 11:43 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's not going against the grain to say that the gop will hold its majorities.
Hell, it would be a MAJOR upset/surprise if they do not.
But I am surprised at how strongly cq has them holding those majorities.
I personally believe that the gop will lose about 9 House seats and 3 Senate seats, while I think the consensus is around there as well. That would still leave them firmly in control of both chambers.
Those predicting the gop to lose one or both chambers are in the distinct minority.
1. Posted by Jeremy Wien | July 11, 2006 11:43 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 11, 2006 11:43
2. Posted by Adjoran | July 11, 2006 2:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, the fMSM and the Democrats have been talking about little else for months.
With a narrow majority in the House, it is natural the minority party will hope to retake control. The low approval levels for the President through the winter and spring fueled this speculation.
Incumbents are hard to beat in House races, though. Those in at least their second term have a 98.5% reelection rate. For Senators the numbers are even higher, over 99%.
With 17 open seats held by Democrats, and 11 by Republicans {including Duke Cunningham's seat, now held by Bilbray as a technical incumbent}, the Democrats would need a major sea change to effect a takeover.
It isn't happening, at least as far as any race-by-race analysis has found so far. But they've been talking about it as if it were a likelihood, setting themselves up for yet another disappointment at the polls.
It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.
2. Posted by Adjoran | July 11, 2006 2:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 11, 2006 14:00
3. Posted by ordi | July 11, 2006 3:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I predict when they lose they will cry "The Election was STOLEN"!
3. Posted by ordi | July 11, 2006 3:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 11, 2006 15:24
4. Posted by Ken Hupp | July 12, 2006 9:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I've also had a hard time swallowing the MSM/Dem propaganda about a takeover of the House and/or Senate. If you know nothing else, you'd have to question that claim by the mere fact that a number of seats that should be safe for the Democrats are in play. So there is ample opportunity for the GOP to offset at least some losses, assuming they occur with pickups elsewhere. It's just that they always write their stories from the template that every Republican seat in play will be a Democrat pickup, but none of the Democrat seats in play will be won by Republicans.
Ken
4. Posted by Ken Hupp | July 12, 2006 9:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 12, 2006 21:03
5. Posted by Kimyl Oh! | July 13, 2006 8:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The Republicans are fielding decent candidates in MN and NJ, and MI as well, but I would say MN and NJ are unlikely. On the other side, MT looks bad for the GOP, as does PA and MO. I think a 2 seat swing toward the left is likely, and a 4 seat swing is possible. I think there is no way the GOP does not lose any seats in the Senate.
5. Posted by Kimyl Oh! | July 13, 2006 8:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 13, 2006 20:33
6. Posted by Charles_in_Texas | July 30, 2006 3:46 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim Talent is a popular former govenor. He WILL NOT lose in Missouri and Conrad Burns' so-called troubles in Montana are DemoncRatic wishful thinking. The Republicans will hold Tennessee. Arizona will be a landslide for Jon Kyl and Mike McGavick will win in Washington and DeWine in Ohio.
6. Posted by Charles_in_Texas | July 30, 2006 3:46 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 03:46
7. Posted by charlie | August 9, 2006 9:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am a republican through out my family history, I am cousins to President's Hoover, Nixon, Ford, and Bush sr& Jr.
What I see is if Fuel Prices keep rising from now and until November 2006 and it causes a shut down in the U.S. Transportation section,and no one can get their goods & services, then the economy collapses like it did when Bush's cousin Herbert Hoover was President, then you will see a big shift in power in the Congress, then it will be Forty more years before a Republican will ever get a chance again. Everyone seems to forget that History Repeats its self.
7. Posted by charlie | August 9, 2006 9:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 9, 2006 21:29